I have no idea whether this is true or not but I once heard someone say that 80% of all websites don’t sell anything. Yet, probably 80% of all web analytics examples and case studies are based on transactional activities such as buying something or subscribing to something. You can see why, as it’s much easier to demonstrate performance improvement or increases in return on investment when there are hard dollar signs attached.
But how do you measure success or improvement on the vast majority of websites where there is no direct financial benefit? Take for example, lead generation sites or public sector sites. How do these website owners know that they are doing a good job and are spending their money wisely and optimally? I think that this is an increasingly important area for the web analytics industry to get its head around as more and more of these types of website owners are looking for ways to demonstrate value from their digital marketing investments.
As with any process in determining success, it’s important to be clear about the objectives. Why do you have a website in the first place? What is its role? Then, think about what “good” looks like. What are the characteristics of visitor behaviour that you consider to be valuable on the website? Finally, can you measure these behaviours directly or indirectly?
Let’s take an example based on an experience I’m going through at the moment – buying a car. I’m assuming that of the main objectives of a car manufacturer’s website is to convince me enough that they have the right car for me that I will take one for a test drive. I therefore have to feel good about the car I’m thinking of buying (a branding effect), find the information to help me decide as to the right model and specification (a search process) and then be able to contact the appropriate dealer so that I can take one out for a test drive. There are a number of different processes going on which of course may take place over multiple visits.
It’s possible to take this typical visitor behaviour and characterise what “good behaviour” looks like. This may be the fact that I looked at certain pages but it is more likely that I did certain things in certain sequences such as downloading a specification sheet and then using the dealer location tool. In trying to understand the effectiveness of the site it is likely that outputs that report on and analyse sequences of activity are going to be more useful and generate more insight that ones that report binary activity, such as whether someone visited a page or not.
In addition, just observing behaviour doesn’t give you the complete picture. The fact that someone visited a specification sheet doesn’t tell you whether someone found the information they are looking for of not. In my car buying example I was looking for the capacity of the boot (or trunk) of a certain model of car to compare to some other cars. I clicked all over the place, spent loads of time reading certain pages. In many ways my behaviour might have been considered valuable with many pages viewed and long dwell times on key pages. But I never found the information I was looking for.
If there is to be more progress in the measurement of success of non-transactional websites then the role of surveys and other visitor feedback devices needs to strengthened as part of the overall mix. The success of a visit where there is no transaction involved needs to be defined almost on the visitors own terms and the only people who can tell you whether their visit was successful or not are the visitors themselves.
Non-transactional websites are generally harder to measure. Recent debates in the web analytics world are discussing the development of new metrics and strategies for measuring concepts such as “engagement”. It’s great that the debate is going on. We also need to step outside the box and recognise that the behavioural data will always need to be interpreted in the context of visitor perceptions and feedback. I would suggest that organisations that are looking to measure success on sites that have little or no transactional activity should be looking to invest as much time and effort in developing a consistent and managed programme of visitor feedback as they do in getting their behavioural data sorted.
More from Applied Insights
This entry was posted on 15 Jan 2007 by Neil Mason.
Filed under:
- Articles
- Web analytics
Find an article or post
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Keywords
Analytics strategy Blogchat Campaign analysis Consumer insight Data integration Data mining Europe Forecasting Future conferences KPIs Loyalty Optimisation Past conferences Predictive analytics Search engine marketing Segmentation Surveys Testing WAA Web analytics


